• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SPIDERSCIENCE.COM

  • Home
  • List
  • Nokia
  • Samsung
  • Chinese
  • Gear
  • Security

Samsung Galaxy Royal vs. Realme GT7 Pro: 200MP Cameras, 7900mAh Battery!

by Christoph

Are you excited to see the Samsung Galaxy Royal vs. Realme GT7 Pro, featuring 200MP cameras and a 7900mAh battery? Continue reading to discover today’s champion!

Samsung Galaxy Royal vs. Realme GT7 Pro: 200MP Cameras, 7900mAh Battery!

Samsung Galaxy Royal vs. Realme GT7 Pro specs

The market will soon see the arrival of the Samsung Galaxy Royal, boasting impressive specifications and stunning designs. Simultaneously, the Realme GT7 Pro is set to launch, featuring a sleek appearance and remarkable functionalities. Firstly, the Samsung Galaxy Royal specs bring a 7.84-inch AMOLED with 2040 x 3088 pixels resolution. Besides, it comes with a ratio of 21:9 and a 120Hz refresh rate. Conversely, the Realme GT7 Pro specs flaunt a 6.7-inch AMOLED with 1080 x 2412 pixel resolution.

Hence, the Samsung phone wins the first round with a better display. Under the hood, the Samsung flagship uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset. In the meantime, the Realme phone provides the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 SoC. Notably, both handsets operate on Android 14. Additionally, the new Samsung handset now arrives with 10GB/ 12GB/ 16GB of RAM and 256GB/ 512GB/ 1TB of internal storage. There is a microSD card supporting expanded storage up to 1TB.

Furthermore, the Realme gadget has 128GB/ 8GB RAM, 256GB/ 8GB RAM, 256GB/ 12GB RAM, and 512GB/ 12GB RAM (no card slot). Therefore, Samsung Mobile wins this round because of its greater storage capacity. Moreover, the Samsung smartphone has a 7900mAh battery box and 80W fast charging support. The Realme device also houses a smaller 6000mAh juice box and 33W fast-wired charging support. Are you looking for a picture-taking system? Optics-wise, the Samsung Galaxy Royal cameras boost a triple rear camera setup, including 200MP primary lens + 64MP telephoto + 32MP ultrawide shooter. Additionally, it has a 50MP front-facing shooter. Besides, the Realme GT7 Pro cameras feature dual lenses at the back. It comprises a 100MP primary sensor + 2MP depth shooter on the rear and a 16MP selfie shooter. As a result, the Realme beast wins in this round for a better camera system. Finally, the Samsung Galaxy Royal may arrive in two colors, Black and Orange, while the Realme GT7 Pro may be available in two colors: Submarine Blue and Navigator Beige. 

Samsung Galaxy Royal vs. Realme GT7 Pro release date and price

According to our reports, the Samsung Galaxy Royal release date might happen soon this month. In contrast, the Realme GT7 Pro release date happened in January 2024. Concerning the cost, the Samsung Galaxy Royal price begins at $372 ~ to Rs. 30,665. Also, the Realme GT7 Pro price starts at $477 ~ Rs. 39,815. Which one do you choose? Let us know in the comment section!

<< Previous

NEXT >>

Primary Sidebar

MORE TO SEE

Xiaomi 15 Pro vs. OnePlus 13T: 16GB RAM, 5000mAh Battery!

Samsung Galaxy Beam 2025 Specs: 18GB RAM, 200MP Cameras!

Nokia 3310 Pro vs. iQOO Neo 10 Pro: 64MP Cameras, 5000mAh Battery!

Nokia Vitech Pro Lite 2025 Specs: 200MP Cameras, 8000mAh Battery!

Nokia Safari Pro Max 2025 Specs: 200MP Cameras, 10800mAh Battery!

Nokia Zenjutsu Compact 2025 Specs: 150MP Cameras, 7200mAh Battery!

Footer

About Us

"We have a passion for mobile tech, and on our news website, you'll discover the latest insights: Which smartphone features are truly smart and innovative? Which mobile operating system offers the best user experience? How to pick the perfect mobile device to suit your needs? Why certain mobile habits can be harmful? How to recognize signs of tech trouble and when your device is sending you distress signals? How to become a mobile aficionado? You'll uncover solutions to these and numerous other pressing inquiries."

Search

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact Us
Copyright © 2025 Spiderscience.com